Environmental Issues
Public registers
POEO Public Register
Licences, applications and notices search
Penalty notices search
Enforceable undertakings search
Enforceable undertakings media releases
Exemptions and approvals search
Prosecutions or civil proceedings search
Terms of use: POEO public register
Licensing FAQs
List of licences
Unlicensed premises regulated by the EPA
Contaminated land record of notices
About the record of notices
List of notified sites
Tips for searching
Disclaimer
Dangerous goods licences
Pesticide licences
Radiation licences
Home
Public registers
POEO Public Register
Licences, applications and notices search
Non-Compliance detail
Summary
Licence number:
372
Annual Return Start:
01 Jul 2005
Annual Return End:
30 Jun 2006
Date Received:
29 Aug 2006
Licence Condition number
Type of non-compliance
EPA actions
No. of times occurred
L1.4 (a)
Overflows of the reticulation system reached waterways in dry weather, due to blockages caused by tree roots, debris, fat buildup or broken structures.
Appropriate Action taken by licensee
80
M2.1
Samples not collected and analysed in the required time frame due to analysis error
Appropriate Action taken by licensee
4
M2.2
specified sampling period not complied with, however required number of samples were collected.
Appropriate Action taken by licensee
1
O2.1
Licensee reported non-compliance with this requirement, because internal performance targets for response times to sewer overflows were not consistently met, due to priority given to water leaks during drought period.
Appropriate Action taken by licensee
1
O3.2
Not all flows received the stipulated treatment due failure of a reclaimed effluent pipe.
Appropriate Action taken by licensee
1
O5.1
Ongoing improvement and no deterioration from existing system performance could not be demonstrated due to the average number of odour complaints received during the reporting period being greater than the average of the previous period.
Appropriate Action taken by licensee
1
R4.1 (b)
After hours notification did not specify that surcharge had occurred within school grounds, leading to delayed notification to relevant external stakeholders
EPA to monitor future compliance with this condition
1